Skip to main content

Mind the Gap and Business Technology

"MIND THE GAP AND THE ACCIDENTAL TECHNOLOGISTS" is the topic on which Andy Mulholland wrote an interesting note recently, and I so wish if this were a guest post on this blog, if only for the namesake.

Highlighting 'the gap', as he puts it, Andy describes the misalignment of Technology focus with Business needs. The problem is rather recent, cropping up only from 90's, because before that, nobody actually bothered. The flexibility of IT introduced by leaps and bounce of advances of the recent decades is the reason for this widening gap because previously the rigidity of how computer systems worked almost ensured that business accepted what (MIS) system owners dictated.

The business focus had been on niche product development. The roles were fixed within processes, and automation and IT provided the definitive and genuine competitive advantage. The overall stability of this model ensured that investment in monolithic computing systems was made even though payback took time to realise.

Things change with induction of PC's on corporate floors, while data becomes the driving force of information but could not prevent multiple copies, sources, media and overall chaos. In this sense, the sole purpose of an IT department is to ensure that "a single version of truth" exists, and to have a strong control around it.

...the sole purpose of an IT department is to ensure that "a single version of truth" exists, with a strong control...
The world faces a very different business models and technology demand. Also, technological challenges are very different - such as most people have better technology at homes than what is provided at work, and that only adds to the frustration towards IT department. As customer trends shift towards individual willingness to pay more if one gets exactly what one wants, the costly and endless customizations such as BMW Mini actually turn more profitable. Such flexibility can only be attained by models such as Business Network Transformation that combines Web 2.0 and Cloud computing.

The modern era of Collaboration is that of "Business Technology" as against to traditional Information Technology. The information flow via BT of front office of modern era is getting more and more unstructured and loosely controlled, while IT continues to manage the structured core systems of back office. This front office type Collaboration is to minimize waste of time by having a readily available platform for the like-minded folks having particular expertise to find each other, come together and find answers in real time.

BT is decentralization of control, and by which it proposes a fundamental departure of the traditional IT mind. That is where the business managers (of the front office) take technology in their hands, and "accidentally" become technologists.

  • See also:
  • Go here for Mulholland's post on the topic.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Pygmalion vs. The Golem Effect

There are two kinds of self-fulfilling prophecies. They are broadly defined by wiki as follows: The Pygmalion effect , or Rosenthal effect, is the phenomenon in which the greater the expectation placed upon people, the better they perform. On the other hand is the Golem effect , in which low expectations lead to a decrease in performance. In ancient Greek mythology, Pygmalion fell in love with one of his sculptures, which then came to life. The theme was in the main stray of many English literary works during the victorian era. One of which is George Bernard Shaw's play titled "Pygmalion" from which Rosenthal effect gets its name. In Shaw's play, the protagonist, a professor of phonetics Henry Higgins makes a bet that he can train a bedraggled Cockney flower girl, Eliza Doolittle, to pass for a duchess at an ambassador's garden party by teaching her to assume a veneer of gentility, the most important element of which, he believes, is impeccable speech. (The pl

"Peter Drucker - Managing Oneself" on SlideShare.net

IN THE INTRODUCTORY paragraph of this legendary paper for Harvard Business Review, Peter Drucker writes: We live in an age of unprecedented opportunity: If you've got ambition and smarts, you can rise to the top of your chosen profession, regardless of where you started out.  But with opportunity comes responsibility. Companies today aren't managing their employees' careers; knowledge workers must, effectively, be their own chief executive officers. It's up to you to carve out your place, to know when to change the course, and to keep yourself engaged and productive during a work life that may span some 50 years. To do those things well, you will need to cultivate a deep understanding of yourself - not only what your strengths and weaknesses are but also how you learn, how you work with others, what your values are, and where you can make the greatest contribution. Because only when you operate from strengths can you achieve true excellence. Marking a small foot

HBR: Most Popular Articles of 2010

AN EXCITING YEAR IS DRAWING TO A CLOSE. Coming full circle of seasons it is winter again while the haven freezes over and a friend messaged from Leh in north-western Himalayas, "Its -15.4° C (4.2° F) here. Expect snow typing." I am almost sure it was meant to read "slow typing". HBR on their part collectively published some 1000+ articles over the last 365 days. Recently, one of the editors listed the top 10 most popular articles among them (try  here ). Listed below are the five articles that I liked most. 1. Why I Returned My iPad by Peter Bregman Peter Bregman stands in a two-hour queue-for-a-gadget for the first time to get his hands on iPad on its launch day. And within days, he is hooked. In this I-fear-I-might-loose-boredom post, Bregman talks about returning his iPad to Apple because it was "too good". He writes, "It's too easy. Too accessible. Both too fast and too long-lasting. For the most part, it does everything I could want. W