Skip to main content

Mind the Gap and Business Technology

"MIND THE GAP AND THE ACCIDENTAL TECHNOLOGISTS" is the topic on which Andy Mulholland wrote an interesting note recently, and I so wish if this were a guest post on this blog, if only for the namesake.

Highlighting 'the gap', as he puts it, Andy describes the misalignment of Technology focus with Business needs. The problem is rather recent, cropping up only from 90's, because before that, nobody actually bothered. The flexibility of IT introduced by leaps and bounce of advances of the recent decades is the reason for this widening gap because previously the rigidity of how computer systems worked almost ensured that business accepted what (MIS) system owners dictated.

The business focus had been on niche product development. The roles were fixed within processes, and automation and IT provided the definitive and genuine competitive advantage. The overall stability of this model ensured that investment in monolithic computing systems was made even though payback took time to realise.

Things change with induction of PC's on corporate floors, while data becomes the driving force of information but could not prevent multiple copies, sources, media and overall chaos. In this sense, the sole purpose of an IT department is to ensure that "a single version of truth" exists, and to have a strong control around it.

...the sole purpose of an IT department is to ensure that "a single version of truth" exists, with a strong control...
The world faces a very different business models and technology demand. Also, technological challenges are very different - such as most people have better technology at homes than what is provided at work, and that only adds to the frustration towards IT department. As customer trends shift towards individual willingness to pay more if one gets exactly what one wants, the costly and endless customizations such as BMW Mini actually turn more profitable. Such flexibility can only be attained by models such as Business Network Transformation that combines Web 2.0 and Cloud computing.

The modern era of Collaboration is that of "Business Technology" as against to traditional Information Technology. The information flow via BT of front office of modern era is getting more and more unstructured and loosely controlled, while IT continues to manage the structured core systems of back office. This front office type Collaboration is to minimize waste of time by having a readily available platform for the like-minded folks having particular expertise to find each other, come together and find answers in real time.

BT is decentralization of control, and by which it proposes a fundamental departure of the traditional IT mind. That is where the business managers (of the front office) take technology in their hands, and "accidentally" become technologists.

  • See also:
  • Go here for Mulholland's post on the topic.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Independent Directors at OpenAI

Sam Altman was the CEO and  Greg Brockman  was the chairman of the board  at OpenAI.org, the parent company that is listed as a not-for-profit organization in the US u/s 501(C)(3).   On 17 Nov 2023 both of them were fired by the Independent Directors of the board. This post talks about the 4-day drama that ensued at the back of these events, focusing on the role of Independent Directors. (Try here for a related earlier post.) One year ago the company launched the ChatGPT, the Large Language Model, that rose to prominence with its Generative AI capabilities (“GPT” or Generative Pre-trained Transformer) and human-like response and interactive interface (“Chat”). At launch ChatGPT was based on based on GPT-3.5 series. The launch took the internet by storm as Microsoft unveiled its commercial partnership with the firm, and its global marketing machine geared into action.  To accommodate for this new profit-making "partnership" endeavor, the firm came up with anothe...

OpenAI and the Network Effect (ft. Md Rafi and Ola Krutrim)

"Who is the greatest Bollywood singer of all times?" I typed into chat.krutrim.com It listed seven, but missed Mohammad Rafi.  Horrified, I followed up, "Why is Mohammad Rafi not in this list?"  And it missed the context, replying, "Mohammad Rafi is not in the list because the list you are referring to is not provided." With a deep sigh, it reminded me of Altman's India visit June last year. Someone asked him if India should invest in building a Foundational model (assuming funding and talent is not as issue). And he replied , "it would be hopeless to compete with us on training foundation models.. you shouldn’t try”. Try they will, and they should. The world's fourth(?) largest economy has pockets of deep pockets that can sustain the demands of developing a resource hungry technology such at Foundational LLMs. But distribution, diffusion and monetisation remains challenging, when chatGPT, Copilot and Gemini in Indic languages are just an App ...

$NVDA: When You are The Moat

NVIDIA had their earnings call yesterday for the quarter ending Dec'23. Markets were muted in anticipation. As expected, the S&P 500 rose by 2.5% on the back of a strong performance and pipeline. The day after, NVIDIA stock rallied to all time high of $800. This gave the company a market cap of USD 2 Tn, surpassing Alphabet, Inc., and becoming the fourth largest listed company in the world by market value.  For perspective consider this - the single day gain of USD 277Bn was bigger than the largest listed company in India - the world's 4th biggest equity market, and by an estimate its market cap was now larger than the entire SENSEX of India. Who knew? Perhaps not even Berkshire Hathaway. (See share holding pattern in the links below). One of the simplest reasons for the meteoric rise of NVIDIA is, as Warren Buffet once famously said about resilient businesses, that NVIDIA provides a moat to the the software firms for their business of developing and productising AI and, sp...